<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How loud is a piece of string?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pintsized.co.uk/2008/12/24/how-loud-is-a-piece-of-string/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pintsized.co.uk/2008/12/24/how-loud-is-a-piece-of-string/</link>
	<description>Nothing to see hear...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Packe</title>
		<link>http://www.pintsized.co.uk/2008/12/24/how-loud-is-a-piece-of-string/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Packe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pintsized.co.uk/?p=53#comment-7</guid>
		<description>1. I think maximising loudness does create the illusion of strength or fullness in a recording but can definitely be fatiguing after a while. It depends on the style of the track though - it&#039;s particularly important with upbeat/dancey tracks. It&#039;s a shame that we&#039;ve almost become dependant on a minimum level of perceived loud/fullness in order for a track to sound professional. 
2. I rarely find that the perceived volume of individual tracks varies so much that i really feel the need to adjust the volume. If this were the case i think it could get pretty annoying. Most of the time i think ears are pretty could at readjusting to the volume without much disturbance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I think maximising loudness does create the illusion of strength or fullness in a recording but can definitely be fatiguing after a while. It depends on the style of the track though &#8211; it&#8217;s particularly important with upbeat/dancey tracks. It&#8217;s a shame that we&#8217;ve almost become dependant on a minimum level of perceived loud/fullness in order for a track to sound professional.<br />
2. I rarely find that the perceived volume of individual tracks varies so much that i really feel the need to adjust the volume. If this were the case i think it could get pretty annoying. Most of the time i think ears are pretty could at readjusting to the volume without much disturbance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam butters</title>
		<link>http://www.pintsized.co.uk/2008/12/24/how-loud-is-a-piece-of-string/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>adam butters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pintsized.co.uk/?p=53#comment-6</guid>
		<description>1 not really i like to hear the parts of a recording in a natural way i dont think loudness= quality in fact most of the time in my opinion it spoils the listening
2 i dont mind changing volumes between recordings at all after all its not that much of a inconvenience</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 not really i like to hear the parts of a recording in a natural way i dont think loudness= quality in fact most of the time in my opinion it spoils the listening<br />
2 i dont mind changing volumes between recordings at all after all its not that much of a inconvenience</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
